Sep 17, 2009 7:05 PM
Easy-add is lame-ish
-
Like (0)
Sorry to be negative here, but I had such high hopes for easy-add when I first saw it and I found it less than useful and I think it would be very confusing if I were a new user.
The "Manually find devices" option:
The "Autodiscover devices" option:
Thanks for allowing me to vent. On the plus side, event management in general in Zenoss is a thing of beauty.
Matt
Zenoss 2.4.5 stack-installed
CentOS 5.2
2 comments here...
I believe Zenoss understand the need for better classification at discovery time and I am hoping that something will be materialising in the King Crab, 2.5 release when I get to play with the beta.
I did some work in this area back at the beginning of the year and wrote a paper that I have uploaded to docs/DOC-3540 .
The paper mainly focuses on the auto-classification aspect and has a couple of scripts that I will attach to this discussion. dev_to_class assigns a device to a device class - you change the code to affect the decision criteria. disco_to_ping was an attempt to classify those devices auto-discovered by doing a network discovery (so devices end up in the /Discovered class) and move them to the /Ping class.
The other aspect that I played around with was to perform script-based discovery with a Comma Separated Values (CSV) input file defining devices to be discoverd - this includes pretty-well any zProperty you want to assign. This is jc_batch_load_2.py . It dates back to Zenoss 2.3 and there were some intermittent issues at the time that Zenoss thought should now be fixed but I haven't been back and checked...
If you try these, please let me know if they work for you!
Update - November 15th 2010 - dev_to_class.py modified as dev_to_class_3.0.py ro work with Zenoss 3.x - code link below. It seems to throw some error messages complaining about cataloging but it does work and do the requested class moves.
Although the script dev_to_class_3.0.py script does move devices to classes, this should be a standard function of Zenoss. There was a rumour when I first did this work 18 months back that something similar "was being incorporated into Zenoss", but we have had 2 major updates since then and no progress.....
Any thoughts, Zenoss?
Cheers,
Jane
Cheers,
Jane
Message was edited by: jcurry
The work you've done is lovely, Jane. Thanks for the detailed response. Here's what I am hoping for Zenoss as far as auto-discovery and discovery-to-class in the future:
Matt
Follow Us On Twitter »
|
Latest from the Zenoss Blog » | Community | Products | Services Resources | Customers Partners | About Us | ||
Copyright © 2005-2011 Zenoss, Inc.
|
||||||||